Archives For Higher education

Adapt or Die

Dwayne Harapnuik —  September 23, 2013 — Leave a comment

Byron P. White, vice president for university engagement and chief diversity officer at Cleveland State University a shares Déjà vu moment by comparing a University senior leadership retreat where the need for innovation and change was discussed to a similar retreat discussion he had years earlier as part of the senior management of the Chicago Tribune. The fundamental challenges that were obvious to the newspaper industry a short while ago are amazingly similar to those that higher education faces now and like the newspaper industry, higher education is not listening to the demands of the general public. The following data is just one example of the gap in thinking:

A survey of 1,000 American adults and 540 senior-level administrators released last fall by Time magazine and the Carnegie Corporation of New York bears this out. While 62 percent of the administrators included “to learn to think critically” as either the most-important or second-most-important reason people should go to college, only 26 percent of the public ranked it as such. Likewise, 80 percent of the adults said that at many colleges, the education students receive is not worth what they pay for it. Only 41 percent of the administrators agreed with them.

Even though I am a staunch supporter of a liberal education even I can see that most people view education as a preparation for jobs rather than a preparation for society. Unlike White who is optimistic and posits that higher education does have the appetite for change I subscribe to Clayton Christensen’s way thinking and suggest that it will take a significant disruption to higher education before we start to see the changes that so many know are necessary.

Read the full article…

Ann Kirschner Dean of William E. Macaulay Honors College at the City University of New York argues that College leaders need to move beyond talking about transformation to actually transforming Higher Education before it’s too late. After reading this article several times I have come to the conclusion any form of summary will not do it justice and suggest that this is an article everyone should read. Therefore, I am sharing the following quotes from the piece to provide a provocative motivation to read the full article:

…when observed from the 20,000-foot level, the basic building blocks of higher education—its priorities, governance, instructional design, and cost structure—have hardly budged.

Although e-learning has been around for nearly 20 years, technology in and out of the classroom is at the discretion of the professor, with rare institutional support or enthusiasm. Online learning has about as much credibility on some campuses as global warming at a Tea Party rally. About the only thing within academe that has moved rapidly is tuition.

…makes it crucially important to consider new approaches—like streamlining pathways to degrees, redesigning models of instruction, competency-based programs, better advising, shutting down or consolidating underperforming programs, and more comprehensive and efficient support services focused solely on getting students to graduation.

Widespread adoption of online courses is, however, just the most obvious next step. We should be agreeing on what standards of data collection make sense for advising our students and tracking their progress, and then moving rapidly at all levels of the university to adopt new technologies that demonstrate improved outcomes (e.g., mobile apps, tablet-based e-textbooks, and game-based learning).

Here again, an openness to change is an essential prerequisite to change. The next step is a consistent and broad-minded strategy that embraces technology and learning at all levels, beginning with faculty who teach with digital gusto, and who are themselves qualified to direct technology-rich projects that will characterize an exciting new generation of scholars and teachers.

Change only happens on the ground. Despite all the reasons to be gloomy, however, there is room for optimism. The American university, the place where new ideas are born and lives are transformed, will eventually focus that lens of innovation upon itself. It’s just a matter of time.

The above quotes have been taken out of context and on their own may seem much more provocative than necessary. This was my intent–to provoke the reader to read the full article…

Read the full article…

The Making the grade 2011 study recently released by Dellotte points to the top 10 issues facing higher education institutions. This report not only identifies the challenges but offers essential strategies that must be considered. The top 10 challenges include:

  1. Over budget and underfunded – As funding declines, cost management is key
  2. The rivalry intensifies – Competition to attract the best students heats up
  3. Setting priorities – The danger of making decisions in the dark
  4. Moving at the speed of cyberspace – Technology upgrades are needed across the board
  5. Rethinking infrastructure – A renewed focus on asset optimization
  6. Linking programs to outcomes – Where training and market demand intersect
  7. The best and the brightest – Attracting and retaining talented faculty
  8. A sustainable future – Enhancing environmental performance
  9. Education for all – Tackling diversity, accessibility and affordability
  10. Regulations and reporting – New responsibilities require better disclosure

I don’t think anyone who has spent any time in higher education will be surprised by this list. While some may view this as an overwhelming challenge, I see this as an wonderful opportunity for progressive institutions to innovative and to really differentiate themselves.

The two areas that present the greatest opportunity are technology implementation and outcomes based learning. The institutions that can leverage technology to manage costs and improve their learning environments will have a distinct advantage over those who simply adopt traditional business IT models that force the user into systems approaches at the expense of the needs of the learner. Similarly institutions that are agile enough to move toward outcomes based curriculum and are also able to provide evidence that their learners can clearly demonstrate these abilities will be able to not only weather the upcoming storm in higher education but will be able to attract the best the brightest students and faculty. It is truly an exciting time to be in higher education–we will be living through some very significant changes.

Download the full report…

http://chronicle.com/article/Facebook-The-New-Classroom/48575/

Facebook: The New Classroom Commons? – The Chronicle Review – The Chronicle of Higher Education via kwout

It is very unfortunate that Harriet L. Schwartz’s, assistant professor of professional leadership at Carlow University, post in the Chronicle of Higher Education is only accessible through a paid subscription because she makes a very well reasoned argument for using facebook in the learning environment. Its where your learners are–and most everyone else.

When my 60 something sister, my wifes 70 something parents and all just about everyone else I know is “friending” me in Facebook I guess I too will have to move from being a passive intermittent user of Facebook and meeting my social network where they are at.

Reminder to self — do not renew Chronicle of Higher Education subscription–this content should be free.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]