Archives For future

Crystal BallImage credit: successfulworkplace.org

Gartner’s analyst explore digital future and provide the top predictions for 2016 and beyond. The predictions have a ‘robo’ trend focus and deal with the emerging practicality of artificial intelligence and a smart machine-driven world where people and machines must define harmonious relationships.

  1. By 2018, 20 percent of business content will be authored by machines.
  2. By 2018, six billion connected things will be requesting support.
  3. By 2020, autonomous software agents outside of human control will participate in five percent of all economic transactions.
  4. By 2018, more than 3 million workers globally will be supervised by a “robo-boss.”
  5. By year-end 2018, 20 percent of smart buildings will have suffered from digital vandalism.
  6. By 2018, 45 percent of the fastest-growing companies will have fewer employees than instances of smart machines.
  7. By year-end 2018, customer digital assistant will recognize individuals by face and voice across channels and partners.
  8. By 2018, two million employees will be required to wear health and fitness tracking devices as a condition of employment.
  9. By 2020, smart agents will facilitate 40 percent of mobile interactions, and the postapp era will begin to dominate.
  10. Through 2020, 95 percent of cloud security failures will be the customer’s fault.

Many of these predictions raise the question of who is going to be serving who in the future–not an examination or definition of what will constitute harmonious relationships. The notion of a “robo-boss” is particularly sobering considering how cold and impersonal many of our day to day business transactions are becoming. Technology should be used as a tool to serve humanity and to enhance learning and life in general. The privacy issues aside too many of these predictions point to a future where these roles are reversed and humanity may start serving the technology that we originally created to serve us.

Read the full post…

Coding is Overrated

If you pay attention to any type of media that has a focus on education, teaching and learning you will have inevitably seen the argument that all children/students should learn to code. The argument runs along this line… computers are everywhere today which means coding is the new literacy or skill of the future; therefore everyone should learn how to code. While this argument makes some sense I have always been hesitant to fully endorse it because I see so many other fundamental skills that our children need. I am not alone in this hesitation.

Jeff Atwood a career programmer who founded two successful software startups is deeply skeptical about teaching all kids to code. Atwood believes that basic exposure to computer science is fine but it should not come at the expense of other fundamental skills like reading, writing and math. He also wants:

children to understand how the Internet works. But this depends more on their acquisition of higher-order thinking than it does their understanding if ones and zeroes. It is essential that they that treat everything they read online critically. Where did that Wikipedia page come from? Who wrote it? What is their background? What are their sources?

Atwood reminds us that many programmers would be much more successful if they could read and write better, think critically and communicate effectively–essentially be better learners.

The longer I spend in the education the more I am convinced it’s about the learning, it’s about making meaningful connections and sharing those connections with others.

Read the full New York Daily News article…

bad predictions

Source: http://www.johntabita.com/tag/technology/

LifelongLearning

Source: http://www.knewton.com/future-lifelong-learning