Search Results For "disruptive innovation"

If you hold to the notion that learning is all about pushing content to students then you will be excited to hear about Blackboard’s recently announced collaboration with the text book publishers: Cenage, Macmillan, Pearson and John Wiley & Sons.

In contrast if you believe that education needs to move from the passive educational environment of main lecture points, content dumping, rubrics, individual competition and standardized testing to an active educational environment of interactive presentations, critical and analytical thinking, collaboration and meaningful projects then this announcement will actually be viewed as an example of a market leader taking potentially disruptive innovations like online learning and electronic content and deploying them in sustaining ways. History has shown that educational institutions at all levels are too quick to jump on the band wagon and simply accept a sustaining innovation that does little to improve learning.

While companies like Blackboard attempt to hide behing labels like Learning Management Systems (LMS) their products have very little to do with learning and everything to do with course and content management. While there are exceptions on how they are used, CMS like Blackboard, Moodle and the like are primarily used for content delivery, assessment and grades assignment and general course administration. As Jeff Young points out:

For professors, the new links will make it easier to push students’ grades on online quizzes from the publishers’ e-textbook systems to the gradebook they use on the Blackboard system.

Automating testing and grade assignment is not going to do anything to improve learning and the easier we make it to use automated testing and grading the less progress we are making toward truly reforming education. Technology today offeres education so much potential, yet we struggle to move beyond 19th and 20th century thinking and methodologies.

The entire article could be summarized by the following statement:

Since the iPad 2 has the most apps it is the best device for a busy executive or anyone for that matter. Patrick Gray’ following statements further summarize the reality that the iPad is the uncontested owner of the tablet face for now:

While the iPad is dead simple to the point of being boring, you’ll find 3-50 contenders for every function you wish to accomplish.

Although Google and its Android software is the most likely competitor for Apple is still has a long way to go with respect to usability and functionality. This is best summarized by Gray’s comparison of Android based ASUS Transformer which:

…seemed like an exotic super-car that required special fuel; while it was a hoot to drive in limited circumstances, that doesn’t help you get work done.

My favorite quote points to Research in Motion continued lack of vision and ability in dealing with disruptive innovation:

…RIM seems thoroughly confused on several fronts.

Read the full article…

All the time everywhere ubiquitous access to the internet is what the promise of mobility will bring. When this is fully realized we will really be able to to learn all the time everywhere. Just how far away is this world. That depends on who you talk to… I also think that the notion that only startups and small companies are moving to the cloud is a classic example of established companies ignoring this disruptive innovation.

Read the full article…

A few weeks back I ran across a blog post called Learned Helplessness and I am realizing that I should have addressed this topic as well in my blog.  The author starts out with a Papert qoute:

What you ought to be learning at school is that you don’t need to be taught in order to learn.

The reason I am addressing this now is that I have been in a conversation with a student in a graduate course I am teaching that focuses on using Disruptive Innovation as a catalyst for change and we are are discussion the challenging notion of creating an environment where our colleagues are willing to embrace the notion that they should not require extensive formal training on how to use technology. I am all for orientation on new technologies, just in time instruction and other forms of informal instruction to help people adjust to new technologies but am against the notion that one shouldn’t be expected to adopt a new technology until has had the formal training. This is learned helplessness.

The reason I didn’t include this in my blog earlier is that even though it is true it is a hard pill for some to swallow and I have been working at catching flies with honey as opposed to vinegar. I have been so careful over the past while not to offend or challenge folks too much that I may be doing them a disservice. Sure, I have pointed to video clips and other blog posts that relay this challenging message making them “the bad guy” by pointing to their hard to swallow doses of reality.

Perhaps I have to challenge my colleagues and peers every once in a while if I really genuinely care about them and the learning. I think we need to find a balance between supporting and encouraging our colleagues while still holding them accountable with respect to their attitudes and actions toward learning.

Jobs does make some very valid points in his comments on the Blackberry, Android and 7 inch tablets.

In addition to pointing out that Apple has surpassed RIM in selling smart phones Jobs also points out that RIM has not gone beyond sustaining innovation and to have any hope of catching Apple they must:

…move beyond their area of strength and comfort

RIM is the next text book example of the effects of disruptive innovation–I have been saying this for the past two years.

Perhaps the best part of the whole article was Jobs’ assessment of Android’s problems being an issue of fragmentation. He points out that the “Open” platform of Android is actually it biggest problem and as a result many Android apps only run on selected Android versions and on specific devices. In contrast Apple offers an integrated platform in which everything just works and the user doesn’t have to become a system integrator. While there is a fair amount of truth in the fragmentation argument and we have over a decade of evidence from the Linux world to attest to the hindrance of fragmentation we haven’t see a company as focused as Google involved in the development of and OS so there may be hope that Android will beat the odds and unite all parties.

Putting his biases aside Jobs makes some very relevant points and as the current leader of disruptive innovation he has earned the right to make the claims that he does and we should at least consider his arguments.

Read the full article…