Archives For failure

In the post To Own Your Learning You MUST Use Higher-Order or Deeper Thinking which I am referring to as Part 1 of this series, I argued that we need to move into an ongoing iterative process of higher-order thinking if we hope to own our learning and improve our situations. I also referred to earlier posts How to Change the World One Learner at a Time from January 2021 which is an update to a 2015 post and Changing the World, one learner at a Time where I started this whole line of thinking and writing. Since that time I have co-authored the COVA eBook and we are just about to publish a second edition of this book as well as are just about to publish the Learner’s Mindset book, so there has been a lot of time and research to help advance the development of these topics.

In the recent video Overcoming Challenges How a Learner’s Mindset Fuels Success I continue my exploration of how to move forward with the Learner’s Mindset and I point to the major challenges that we face when we adopt and live out a Learner’s Mindset.

The reason I continue to add a short written summary for many of my videos is that I want to offer my audience the benefit of an author’s summary perspective and an expansion of my personal story. The current video can be broken into two parts. The first part deals with the challenges of living a Learner’s Mindset and the second part is my admonition that I too experience these challenges and all too often long for a quick fix. Why not just deal with the facts and not labor the point by offering a personal story? I have learned that stories or narrative is what helps people engage and make their own meaningful connections. Don’t take my word for this; look at the evidence yourself. In the post Want To Change the World – Tell a Good Story and The Human Mind is a Story Processor, Not a Logic Processor I point to evidence that shows we are moved by stories because we each have a story of ourselves that we use to reconcile our place in the world so when we hear other’s stories it helps us to understand were this new story can fit. This notion is affirmed further by the research and sources post Feeling Machines that Think and my synthesis The Head Won’t Go Where the Heart Hasn’t Been.

Challenges to the Learner’s Mindset

  1. Pursuit of the quick fix
  2. School works – we learn in spite of the system of education
  3. Pareto Principle or the 80/20 rule

While I do list 3 specific challenges, they are all closely related. I also argue that regardless of your cosmology (whether you believe we have evolved or are the result of intelligent design) the human being is the most amazing entity on the planet. As a result, we have a tendency to look for heuristics, more efficient ways of doing things, or finding shortcuts to problems. This perpetual pursuit of a better way, unfortunately, can lead to another human tendency; embracing the quick fix. While there are immediate time-saving advantages to the quick fix we know from research like Stanford Marshmellow Experiment which reveals that there are benefits to delaying gratification that have long-term consequences in improving our lives. I will also add that a quick fix like a visit to MacDonalds while on a trip can be a wonderful time saver and even a treat, but a steady diet of burgers and fries from MacDonalds will have dire long-term health consequences demonstrated by Morgan Spurlock in Supersize Me (2004). When we apply the quick fix to education, we must acknowledge that last-minute cramming or last-minute stream-of-consciousness writing will enable most learners to pass the test or write a passable essay. While this will work to get by one should consider if they would be willing to trust their safety crossing a bridge designed by an engineer who perpetually crammed for their exams and just did the bare minimum to get by.

When you combine our intrinsic capacity to do enough to get by with our current behaviorist model of education, which simply asks for the regurgitation of information on an exam or other summative assessment, many people will look back on their educational experience and confirm that this quick-fix can work. I also have to admit that I have used this quick-fix approach in my high school upgrading and also in much of my undergraduate studies. I recall a couple of Psychology courses that I not only passed but scored 110% (there were bonus points) in all the exams. Once I learned that the instructor was using the questions at the back of each chapter, I simply memorized the questions and variations of answers and aced all the exams. When I was sure that this model of instruction and testing was going to be consistent I also stopped going to the lectures. This enabled me to do better than the Pareto Principle or 80/20 rule because I put in about 10% effort and got 110% results. I also quickly realized I could easily put in 20% effort and get a “B” or an “A-” in most other courses. Getting that “A” or topping the class did take more effort and in my undergraduate studies, I did put in that extra effort in very selected courses and graduated with High Distinction which is equivalent to a 4.0 average. When I moved on to my graduate studies I realized that the information transfer model and the pursuit of an extrinsic motivator of grades was still being used in many required courses so I put in 10-20% effort to get that B or even an A and used my remaining time to focus on the courses that required more effort. I used the remaining time to improve my family’s living circumstances by working full-time to support my family and paid for my education without incurring any debt. In contrast, most of my classmates were more concerned with getting good grades and passing the test rather than using the learning environment as an opportunity to prepare for life.

One of the biggest problems with our system of education is that it only prepares students to pass the test but it doesn’t fully prepare students for life. Passing the test is easy and we all know people who have become very proficient at passing the test or demonstrating a skill or process. While these people are able to regurgitate information or recite a process, too many do not have the capacity to make a meaningful connection and use all that acquired information, recipes, and processes to change significant aspects of their lives or anyone else’s.

This leads me to the shift back to the video summary and to the story/narrative or the point in the video where I admit that I also have struggled with staying in the Learner’s Mindset just like anyone else. While I have successfully eliminated or prevented the need for knee surgery by moving completely to Xero barefoot shoes and working through a combination of Ben Patrick’s Knees Over Toes/ATG processes, Kelly Starrett’s Becoming a Supple Leopard 2nd Ed, Stuart McGill’s research, and many other approaches to rehab my knee I have also failed repeatedly along the way. Some of those failures were attributed to my nagging tendency to go for a quick fix and try to implement a partial solution rather than fully analyze and evaluate all the options as I tried to synthesize a more complete solution that was unique to my circumstance. Fortunately, these failures are simply part of the learning process. The quicker you fail or find out what doesn’t work the quicker you get to what will work. John Maxwell coined the term failing forward and offers Seven Principles for Failing Forward in his post Failing Forward.

Living the Learner’s Mindset, using my research skills and my uncompromising need to go to primary sources counters my laziness and has enabled me to sort through the plethora of copycat videos and sites to find the true authorities in a variety of integrated health disciplines including but not limited to exercise physiology, kinesiology, medicine, and nutrition. Because I live the Learner’s Mindset I am able to embrace my latest challenge of increasing my mobility as another opportunity for growth. Many of the lessons I learned in fixing my knee by fixing my feet can now be directly applied to fixing my mobility. Many of the resources and experts that I have already vetted can help me with this new endeavor.

My goal of being able to do a pistol squat is getting more attainable every day. Nearly a month has passed between when I finished the video in this post and when I have written this post and in that time the latest mobility solution that I have adopted is beginning to show improvement. I can stand and balance on one foot and put on my shoe and then switch to the other foot and put on my other shoe without falling over; most of the time. This is a major improvement. It doesn’t look very stable yet with my left side but as I strive to increase my stability with this movement it will continue to improve. Because I am continually evaluating my performance and also continually analyzing what I need to do to improve, I have noticed that my balance on my right side is much stronger and I have some persistent issues with my left side. The ongoing iterative process of continual improvement that is part of the Learner’s Mindset encourages me to see this latest challenge with balance as one more opportunity to grow and improve my mobility overall. I am also at the point in my personal diagnostic process where I will need another set of eyes and hands to help me determine the most appropriate actions to improve my strength and balance and overall mobility. One more trip to my integrated health specialist (fancy name for a Chiropractor) is in order to help me analyze/diagnose where I am at and what I need to do to make the next set of improvements.

This is going to take more time, but as I stated earlier the ongoing iterative process is necessary for the higher-order thinking process of evaluation, analysis, synthesis, and creation to be fully realized. This is just part of the Learner’s Mindset. This is not a treatment or a remedial activity; it is the way that we all need to live out our daily experiences. I am just going to add the qualified opinion of a trusted expert to help me with my analysis and help me to synthesize and create a new refinement to my current routine. Time and persistence is the key as is remembering that the effort is worth it.

The start of a new year or new decade often brings prognostications and assessments of earlier predictions that may or may not have come to pass. I have been working in and around educational technology (Ed-Tech) for over three decades now, so Audrey Watters post The 100 Worst Ed-Tech Debacles of the Decade gave me the opportunity to think back on the past ten years and consider whether or not I fell prey any of the empty promises that are unfortunately a big part of the Ed-Tech world. Even though I often refer to myself as a delusional optimist when it comes to Ed-Tech I have learned to temper my optimism and be a realist. Watters confirmed many of my skepticisms in her post.

As I read through the piece I thought of many more Ed-Tech debacles that I would have included. The following list is a subset of Watters’s full list and it represents many of the skeptical thoughts I had when these issues originally came to light. Unfortunately, some of these debacles are ongoing and I predict that they may be included in Watter’s list in another decade—why does it take us so long to learn.

Regardless, the following list is what stood out to me and the following quote from the post is intended to provide a summary perspective. I encourage you to review the whole list and make your own summary.

96. Ning “…So many lessons here about controlling your own data and not relying on free ed-tech products.”

92. “The Flipped Classroom” “…the whole “flipped classroom” model is based on the practice of homework — a practice that is dubious at best and onerous at worst? As education author Alfie Kohn has long argued, homework represents a “second shift” for students, and there’s mixed evidence they get much out of it.”

90. “Ban Laptops” Op-Eds “…A “ban laptops” op-ed may be the greatest piece of ed-tech clickbait ever devised.”

89. Clickers “…The greatest trick the ed-tech devil ever played was convincing people that clicking was “active learning.”

86. Badges – “…Despite predictions that badges would be the “new credential” and that we were looking at a “Future Full of Badges,” it’s not clear that digital badges have provided us with a really meaningful way to assess skills or expertise.”

82. “The End of Library” Stories “…Libraries haven’t gone away — they’re still frequently visited, despite dramatic drops in public funding. More and more public libraries have started eliminating fines too because libraries, unlike Techcrunch writers, do care to alleviate inequality.”

69. Unbundling …They want the bundle. They don’t want “content loops.” They aren’t shopping for “content pathways.” They want to choose a school. They want a degree.”

57. Turnitin “…Rather than trusting students, rather than re-evaluating what assignments and assessments look like, schools have invested heavily in any number of technology “solutions” to cheating — keystroke locking, facial recognition, video monitoring, and the like, all designed to identify students with “low integrity.”

56. Brain Training “…another study published that same year in Neuropsychology Review found that most brain training programs had no peer-reviewed evidence demonstrating their efficacy.”

55. Montessori 2.0 “…I’d wager if you ask most Americans to describe “progressive education,” they’d cite one of two names in doing so: John Dewey and Maria Montessori. They’ve likely not read any Dewey — just see the phrases attributed to him on PowerPoint presentations and on edu-celebrity Twitter. And they know little about Montessori either, other than it’s a kind of preschool where kids play with wooden blocks. So not surprisingly, as tech executives sought to open their own, private schools, they have turned to a largely imagined legacy of progressive education, often referring to their experiments as “Montessori 2.0”

53. TED Talks “…very exploitation and inequality that the TED Talks promise, with their 18-minute-long sleight-of-hand, to disrupt.”

50. One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) “… a controlled study in Peru published in 2012 found no evidence that the OLPC tablets increased children’s math or language learning.”

48. The Hour of Code “…whether an hour of code or a “genius hour” — is hardly a sufficient commitment to changing education or, for that matter, to changing industry.”

44. YouTube, the New “Educational TV” “…Parents have long been criticized for letting television “raise their children,” But YouTube now means a much stranger and potentially more dangerous, data-driven viewing experience.”

38. Coding Bootcamps “…Google’s director of education echoed this sentiment: “Our experience has found that most graduates from these programs are not quite prepared for software engineering roles at Google without additional training or previous programming roles in the industry.”

36. “Personalized Learning” Software (and Facebook and Summit Public Schools) “…According to data obtained by Chalkbeat, “Since the platform was made available, 18% of schools using it in a given year had quit using it a year later.“

22. Automated Essay Grading “…Automated essay grading software can be fooled with gibberish, as MIT’s Les Perelman has shown again and again. ”

10. Google for Education “…Chromebooks now make up 60% of all laptops and tablets sold to K-12 schools, up from 5% in 2012….“It’s a private company very creatively using public resources — in this instance, teachers’ time and expertise — to build new markets at low cost,”

8. LAUSD’s iPad Initiative “…In 2013, the Los Angeles Unified School District awarded a $30 million contract for Apple, paving the way (supposedly) for an ambitious $1.3 billion plan to give every student in the district an iPad…In 2015, the school board voted on a $6.5 million settlement with Apple over the project. ”

7. ClassDojo and the New Behaviorism “…ClassDojo and other types of behavior management products claim that they help develop “correct behavior” and “right mindsets.” But what exactly does “correct behavior” entail? And what does it mean if schools entrust this definition to for-profit companies and their version of psychological expertise?”

6. “Everyone Should Learn to Code” “…Over and over and over this past decade, we were told that “everyone should learn to code.” We were told there is a massive “skills gap”: too few people have studied science, technology, engineering, or math; and employers cannot find enough skilled workers to fill jobs in those fields…But it’s a powerful myth, and one that isn’t terribly new, dating back at least to the launch of the Sputnik satellite in 1957 and subsequent hand-wringing over the Soviets’ technological capabilities and technical education as compared to the US system. ”

4. “The Year of the MOOC” “…The MOOC revolution simply wasn’t.”

Fail Forward

Failing forward is the ability to get back up after you’ve been knocked down, learn from your mistake, and move forward in a better direction.
— John C. Maxwell

I overheard a short part of a conversation my two boys had the other day that confirmed the importance of authentic projects, failing forward and having the willingness to explore multiple iterations in the pursuit of a specific goal. Let me give you the backstory…

My two boys are young professional athletes in the emerging sports of Down Hill, Freeride, and Enduro mountain racing. They are also entrepreneurs who are exploring ways of getting paid to continue pursuing their passion of extreme riding, extreme sports, and the extreme performance lifestyle. They share a garage which is not only their biking workshop, but also their workshop where they explore a wide assortment of other ideas that they are experimenting with to support and fund their biking, travels, and lifestyle. Levi recently purchased a dual sport motorcycle to save money on fuel cost while driving around town and to explore opportunities in adventure tourism. The bike needed a fair amount of work to get it to a reliable driving state so he needed the workshop during the repair stage. Caleb also uses the workshop to design and fabricate components for his import sports car which he has also been able to sell to other members of the sports car clubs and to the tuner subculture that revolves around modifying imported cars. Some of these ideas are taking off and Caleb has sold multiple copies of some of his creations and is now exploring manufacturing options. Levi has been accepted into the Enduro World Series (EWS) and has two Enduro races in South America this spring he has to train and prepare for and also fund. The list goes on and on. When you consider all that my boys are doing, life around our household is forever changing and there is no shortage of projects, activities, and experiments that happen in a limited shared space.

Due to the extreme housing costs in North Vancouver, we all share a 3 bedroom house and attached garage so my boys not only work and train together they live in close proximity and it is not uncommon to hear them talk about their projects. It is also not uncommon to hear them resolve the use of the workshop that they share. Caleb has been working on prototyping a new canard (a small bumper wing designed to provide downforce on the front end of the car) with hopes of creating a template for a carbon fiber version for which his tuning community is looking. Since the boy’s workshop isn’t that large they must coordinate its use and Levi was checking on the status of Caleb’s latest prototyping project to see when he could get some space back to work on his latest motorbike modification. This finally leads me to the recent conversation in which I overheard Levi asks Caleb:

…when are you going to be finished with the all the fiberglass work you are doing… I need to get my motorbike into the shop.

Caleb responded:

This current prototype isn’t working out so I am going to give up on it and try something different… you can use the shop once I clean up the space.

Levi responded:

Hey! Remember you never give up on anything you just shift your focus to a new direction. He laughed and added… a good general never retreats he just advances in a different direction.

There were some additional exchanges and laughter between the boys and when Levi came down for dinner I thanked him for reminding and encouraging his brother to always frame failing forward in a positive context. Both of my boys have been exposed to and use aspects of the Design Thinking process so the notion of ideation, prototyping, and testing is a very common part of their lives as they continue to explore ways to create new things and solve problems. While it easy to talk about the iterative process and state the importance of failing quickly so that you can find the right prototype that will finally work, it is much more difficult to live the process. I have watched both Levi and Caleb struggle persistently on projects for long periods and there is no denying that weeks or even months worth of failure in ideation, prototyping, and testing can become discouraging. Therefore, hearing one of my boys encouraging his brother to not view his experience as something that he was giving up on but rather a shift in focus assured me that my boys are going to be OK.

As I have stated in other posts, the continual practice of authentic learning and the lessons learned from all those years of authentic projects have prepared my boys to make their way in a very challenging but exciting world. You can’t teach persistence or grit but you can create the environment in which it will grow. You have to create a significant learning environment in which your learners are given the choice, ownership, and voice through those authentic learning opportunities where the continual iterative process of failing forward and repetition of ideation, prototyping, and testing will bring out that grit, persistence, and determination. It also doesn’t hurt to have someone else around who can remind and encourage you to not give up but to shift your focus to a new direction.