Archives For note-taking

Which is better taking notes by handwriting or by typing? Like all research, the answer is in the details and the interpretation, not just the initial results.

The Mueller/Oppenhiemer study The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking revealed that since students can type much faster than they can write there is a tendency for students to mindlessly transcribe large volumes of notes. In contrast, with handwritten notes, a student must focus more on the concepts than on the transcription. The authors pointed to additional research in their literature review suggested summarization and conceptualization resulting from handwriting notes added in retention and deeper understanding.

The authors also speculated as did many other bloggers who reposted the summary results that if one could combine the efficiency of typing with the conceptualization of handwriting that taking notes with a laptop or tablet could contribute equally to memory retention. This is a key point of this debate–Rather then just mindlessly type and record the information being transferred if the typist were to apply the same method of summarization and conceptualization that happens with handwriting notes then typing notes would be even more effective and efficient.

While being more efficient with the passive information transfer required from your typical lecture is helpful in dealing with those situations where one has no choice but to take in a lecture, if we are really concerned with deeper learning then we would provide an alternative to the typical lecture. Since the lecture is still the primary mode of information transfer in secondary and post-secondary education this will continue to be an ongoing issue.

While I have no reason to doubt the Mueller/Oppenhiemer study that is currently popular in the traditional media and blogosphere I am always hesitant to trust the “most popular” opinion and I explored further to see if there were any additional studies that provided an alternative perspective. A recent undergraduate research project by Ian Schoen of Pitzer College that directly compared typing notes and handwriting notes in both the lecture and textbook study. In his senior thesis Effects of Method and Context of Note-taking on Memory: Handwriting versus Typing in Lecture and Textbook-Reading Contexts Schoen found that although the survey participants preferred taking notes by hand, his research revealed that typing notes in a lecture produced slightly higher retention scores.

Article Abstract:

Both electronic note-taking (typing) and traditional note-taking (handwriting) are being utilized by college students to retain information. The effects of the method of note-taking and note-taking context were examined to determine if handwriting or typing notes and whether a lecture context or a textbook-reading context influenced retention. Pitzer College and Scripps College students were assigned to either handwrite or type notes on a piece of academic material presented in either a lecture or textbook context and were given a test to assess their retention. The results demonstrated that there was a significant main effect for typing notes such that typing notes produced higher retention scores than handwriting notes. The results also indicated that there was an interaction between the method of note-taking and context such that the lowest scores were achieved in the condition in which participants hand0-wrote notes during a lecture. In total, these findings suggest that typing as a method of note-taking may be an influential factor in memory retention, particularly in a lecture context.

Read the full article…

If the goal is to retain information from a lecture or other form of information transfer, then taking notes is better than not taking notes is the one fact consistent in all the research on this topic. It is also clear that much more research will need to be conducted to provide a more definitive answer on this issue. Until all the research is in, one’s personal preference should also play a significant role in deciding just how to take notes.

The other key factor in this debate is that you can’t just blindly trust NPR, Scientific America, popular educational websites or other traditional news sources you have to go back to the primary sources to really see what the research points to and how it has been interpreted. Upon closer reading of the research, one could argue if used properly the typing notes on your laptop could be more effective then handwriting–assuming the note take applies the same summarization and conceptualization skills that are required due to the lesser speed of handwriting.

Reference

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581

Schoen, I. (2012). Effects of method and context of note-taking on memory: Handwriting versus typing in lecture and textbook-reading contexts (Pitzer Senior Theses). Pitzer College. Retrieved from http://scholarship.claremont.edu/pitzer_theses/20/

On Tuesday night a fellow Instructional Development Consultant (IDC), and I met with seven Part Time BCIT instructors to take them through the instructional Skills Workshop (ISW). The ISW is a long standing tradition at BCIT and provides and opportunity for new and experienced instructors to come together and explore how to improve their teaching and learning practice. Any time you have faculty coming together to talk about teaching and learning you can be assured that there will be lots of questions and this past Tuesday night was no exception. Since we had limited time to respond to all the questions and request for additional information, I am compiling the following list of links to videos, articles, interview, related resources and a few personal summaries in response to the insightful questions from the workshop participants.

Multistaking

John Medina demonstrates what happens when you attempt to multi-task. This video is part of the supporting material for Medina’s excellent book Brain Rules (Updated and Expanded): 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home, and School

In this talk Clifford Nass of Stanford reveals that we are not only NOT able to multitask he also reveals that those who do multitask the most are poor multitaskers and also have lesser developed social skills. Nass’ research and article Cognitive control in media multitasked reveals that heavy media multitaskers are poor at multitasking. This was one of the most covered and cited papers in the social sciences in the last 12 months. Nass passed away recently at the age of 55.

The NPR interview The Myth of Multitaksing Nass explains how inefficient it is to multitask and how heavy multitasks become chronically distracted.

Research has revealed that 98% of us are not able to multitask but there are those around us who fit into the 2% who can actually multitask. In the New Yorker article Multitask Masters Marina Konnikova reports on the research of David Stayer who has looked into these supertaskers and who has also found that when people find out that there is a very small number of people who can supertask they believe that they fall into this category. Unfortunately, for most us who believe we are these special people, research has also revealed that the better someone believes that they are at multitasking the more likely they are not.

Peer Instruction & Eric Mazur

In the following youtube video, Confessions of a Converted Lecturer, Eric Mazur explains how he came to understand that lecturing alone was not helping his students to learn and how he uses peer instruction to move his students from memorization to understanding.

The Harvard Magazine article, Twilight of the Lecture, summaries Mazur’s work and development of the peer instruction method.

The blog Turn to Your Neighbour is perhaps on the best sites to learn about all aspects of peer instruction.

Note Taking Question

What helps you remember more: taking notes by typing on a laptop or tablet or writing your notes out by hand?

The general discussion in the room revealed that many people preferred taking notes by hand which corresponds to results of the Mueller/Oppenhiemer study The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. This study revealed that since students can type much faster than they can write there is a tendency for students to mindlessly transcribe large volumes of notes. In contrast, with hand written notes a student must focus more on the concepts than on the transcription. The authors pointed to additional research in their literature review suggested summarization and conceptualization resulting from handwriting notes added in retention and deeper understanding.

The authors also speculated as did many other bloggers who reposted the summary results that if one could combine the efficiency of typing with the conceptualization of handwriting that taking notes with a laptop or tablet could contribute equally to memory retention. While I have no reason to doubt the Mueller/Oppenhiemer study that is currently popular in the blogosphere I am always hesitant to trust the “most popular” opinion and I explored further to see if there were any additional studies that provided an alternative perspective.

I did manage to find a recent undergraduate research project by Ian Schoen of Pitzer College that directly compared typing notes and handwriting notes in both the lecture and textbook study. In his senior thesis Effects of Method and Context of Note-taking on Memory: Handwriting versus Typing in Lecture and Textbook-Reading Contexts Schoen found that although the survey participants preferred taking notes by hand, his research revealed that typing notes in a lecture produced slightly higher retention scores.

Article Abstract:

Both electronic note-taking (typing) and traditional note-taking (handwriting) are being utilized by college students to retain information. The effects of the method of note-taking and note-taking context were examined to determine if handwriting or typing notes and whether a lecture context or a textbook-reading context influenced retention. Pitzer College and Scripps College students were assigned to either handwrite or type notes on a piece of academic material presented in either a lecture or textbook context and were given a test to assess their retention. The results demonstrated that there was a significant main effect for typing notes such that typing notes produced higher retention scores than handwriting notes. The results also indicated that there was an interaction between method of note-taking and context such that the lowest scores were achieved in the condition in which participants hand0-wrote notes during a lecture. In total, these findings suggest that typing as a method of note-taking may by an influential factor in memory retention, particularly in a lecture context.

Read the full article…

Taking notes is better than not taking notes is the one fact consistent in all the research on this topic. It is also clear that much more research will need to be conducted to provide a more definitive answer on this issue. Until the research is in, one’s personal preference should also play a significant role in deciding just how to take notes.

Source: CourseHero

View original full sized infographic at CourseHero…

I have been using the iPad since it was first released and in that time I have seen the use of iPads grow to the point where there is so much valuable information out in the blogeshpere that one no longer has to be an expert on all things. Case in point–what note taking application is the best for the iPad? I have used almost all the apps listed in this ProfHacker post and agree with their ranking. In addition I hadn’t yet used UPAD, primarily because it is more than 99 cents and I have already spent more than than on iAnnotate PDF, so I was pleased to find that someone else has explored the app and reported back on its functionality. UPAD is going to be my next app that I spend some money on and I can move forward with this small purchase knowing just how functional the app really is.

This is perhaps one of the most significant reasons why the iPad is the market leader and will be so for many years to come. There are so many people using the devices in so many different ways that one no longer needs to be on the bleeding edge to really benefit from using the device. I have been following ProHacker from their inception and have even contributed with a guest post and it is clear from this blog that most of my colleagues in higher education are using the iPad as well. For the new or novice user knowing that there is a whole community out their willing to share their experiences is a wonderful assurance that they are not alone. For the intermediate to advanced user is exciting to rely on a vibrant community that shares the passion that effective technology is the technology that enables us and our students to focus on the learning–which is really why we are all in this profession.