Archives For quick fix

In the post To Own Your Learning You MUST Use Higher-Order or Deeper Thinking which I am referring to as Part 1 of this series, I argued that we need to move into an ongoing iterative process of higher-order thinking if we hope to own our learning and improve our situations. I also referred to earlier posts How to Change the World One Learner at a Time from January 2021 which is an update to a 2015 post and Changing the World, one learner at a Time where I started this whole line of thinking and writing. Since that time I have co-authored the COVA eBook and we are just about to publish a second edition of this book as well as are just about to publish the Learner’s Mindset book, so there has been a lot of time and research to help advance the development of these topics.

In the recent video Overcoming Challenges How a Learner’s Mindset Fuels Success I continue my exploration of how to move forward with the Learner’s Mindset and I point to the major challenges that we face when we adopt and live out a Learner’s Mindset.

The reason I continue to add a short written summary for many of my videos is that I want to offer my audience the benefit of an author’s summary perspective and an expansion of my personal story. The current video can be broken into two parts. The first part deals with the challenges of living a Learner’s Mindset and the second part is my admonition that I too experience these challenges and all too often long for a quick fix. Why not just deal with the facts and not labor the point by offering a personal story? I have learned that stories or narrative is what helps people engage and make their own meaningful connections. Don’t take my word for this; look at the evidence yourself. In the post Want To Change the World – Tell a Good Story and The Human Mind is a Story Processor, Not a Logic Processor I point to evidence that shows we are moved by stories because we each have a story of ourselves that we use to reconcile our place in the world so when we hear other’s stories it helps us to understand were this new story can fit. This notion is affirmed further by the research and sources post Feeling Machines that Think and my synthesis The Head Won’t Go Where the Heart Hasn’t Been.

Challenges to the Learner’s Mindset

  1. Pursuit of the quick fix
  2. School works – we learn in spite of the system of education
  3. Pareto Principle or the 80/20 rule

While I do list 3 specific challenges, they are all closely related. I also argue that regardless of your cosmology (whether you believe we have evolved or are the result of intelligent design) the human being is the most amazing entity on the planet. As a result, we have a tendency to look for heuristics, more efficient ways of doing things, or finding shortcuts to problems. This perpetual pursuit of a better way, unfortunately, can lead to another human tendency; embracing the quick fix. While there are immediate time-saving advantages to the quick fix we know from research like Stanford Marshmellow Experiment which reveals that there are benefits to delaying gratification that have long-term consequences in improving our lives. I will also add that a quick fix like a visit to MacDonalds while on a trip can be a wonderful time saver and even a treat, but a steady diet of burgers and fries from MacDonalds will have dire long-term health consequences demonstrated by Morgan Spurlock in Supersize Me (2004). When we apply the quick fix to education, we must acknowledge that last-minute cramming or last-minute stream-of-consciousness writing will enable most learners to pass the test or write a passable essay. While this will work to get by one should consider if they would be willing to trust their safety crossing a bridge designed by an engineer who perpetually crammed for their exams and just did the bare minimum to get by.

When you combine our intrinsic capacity to do enough to get by with our current behaviorist model of education, which simply asks for the regurgitation of information on an exam or other summative assessment, many people will look back on their educational experience and confirm that this quick-fix can work. I also have to admit that I have used this quick-fix approach in my high school upgrading and also in much of my undergraduate studies. I recall a couple of Psychology courses that I not only passed but scored 110% (there were bonus points) in all the exams. Once I learned that the instructor was using the questions at the back of each chapter, I simply memorized the questions and variations of answers and aced all the exams. When I was sure that this model of instruction and testing was going to be consistent I also stopped going to the lectures. This enabled me to do better than the Pareto Principle or 80/20 rule because I put in about 10% effort and got 110% results. I also quickly realized I could easily put in 20% effort and get a “B” or an “A-” in most other courses. Getting that “A” or topping the class did take more effort and in my undergraduate studies, I did put in that extra effort in very selected courses and graduated with High Distinction which is equivalent to a 4.0 average. When I moved on to my graduate studies I realized that the information transfer model and the pursuit of an extrinsic motivator of grades was still being used in many required courses so I put in 10-20% effort to get that B or even an A and used my remaining time to focus on the courses that required more effort. I used the remaining time to improve my family’s living circumstances by working full-time to support my family and paid for my education without incurring any debt. In contrast, most of my classmates were more concerned with getting good grades and passing the test rather than using the learning environment as an opportunity to prepare for life.

One of the biggest problems with our system of education is that it only prepares students to pass the test but it doesn’t fully prepare students for life. Passing the test is easy and we all know people who have become very proficient at passing the test or demonstrating a skill or process. While these people are able to regurgitate information or recite a process, too many do not have the capacity to make a meaningful connection and use all that acquired information, recipes, and processes to change significant aspects of their lives or anyone else’s.

This leads me to the shift back to the video summary and to the story/narrative or the point in the video where I admit that I also have struggled with staying in the Learner’s Mindset just like anyone else. While I have successfully eliminated or prevented the need for knee surgery by moving completely to Xero barefoot shoes and working through a combination of Ben Patrick’s Knees Over Toes/ATG processes, Kelly Starrett’s Becoming a Supple Leopard 2nd Ed, Stuart McGill’s research, and many other approaches to rehab my knee I have also failed repeatedly along the way. Some of those failures were attributed to my nagging tendency to go for a quick fix and try to implement a partial solution rather than fully analyze and evaluate all the options as I tried to synthesize a more complete solution that was unique to my circumstance. Fortunately, these failures are simply part of the learning process. The quicker you fail or find out what doesn’t work the quicker you get to what will work. John Maxwell coined the term failing forward and offers Seven Principles for Failing Forward in his post Failing Forward.

Living the Learner’s Mindset, using my research skills and my uncompromising need to go to primary sources counters my laziness and has enabled me to sort through the plethora of copycat videos and sites to find the true authorities in a variety of integrated health disciplines including but not limited to exercise physiology, kinesiology, medicine, and nutrition. Because I live the Learner’s Mindset I am able to embrace my latest challenge of increasing my mobility as another opportunity for growth. Many of the lessons I learned in fixing my knee by fixing my feet can now be directly applied to fixing my mobility. Many of the resources and experts that I have already vetted can help me with this new endeavor.

My goal of being able to do a pistol squat is getting more attainable every day. Nearly a month has passed between when I finished the video in this post and when I have written this post and in that time the latest mobility solution that I have adopted is beginning to show improvement. I can stand and balance on one foot and put on my shoe and then switch to the other foot and put on my other shoe without falling over; most of the time. This is a major improvement. It doesn’t look very stable yet with my left side but as I strive to increase my stability with this movement it will continue to improve. Because I am continually evaluating my performance and also continually analyzing what I need to do to improve, I have noticed that my balance on my right side is much stronger and I have some persistent issues with my left side. The ongoing iterative process of continual improvement that is part of the Learner’s Mindset encourages me to see this latest challenge with balance as one more opportunity to grow and improve my mobility overall. I am also at the point in my personal diagnostic process where I will need another set of eyes and hands to help me determine the most appropriate actions to improve my strength and balance and overall mobility. One more trip to my integrated health specialist (fancy name for a Chiropractor) is in order to help me analyze/diagnose where I am at and what I need to do to make the next set of improvements.

This is going to take more time, but as I stated earlier the ongoing iterative process is necessary for the higher-order thinking process of evaluation, analysis, synthesis, and creation to be fully realized. This is just part of the Learner’s Mindset. This is not a treatment or a remedial activity; it is the way that we all need to live out our daily experiences. I am just going to add the qualified opinion of a trusted expert to help me with my analysis and help me to synthesize and create a new refinement to my current routine. Time and persistence is the key as is remembering that the effort is worth it.

Tech Infusion Workshop
If there is one significant lesson that educators can learn from the COVID pandemic it is that shifting to virtual teaching or remote teaching without a plan or preparation was hard at best and more chaotic for students, teachers, and families than anyone could have predicted.

With the dispersion of vaccines, we are now hearing about a potential resumption of school this coming fall of 2021. But, once schools return to traditional face-to-face attendance, will they revert to pre-COVID norms? Perhaps this past year of reactive remote learning will help school leaders to recognize that we need to be proactive and leverage technology to reshape their schools and transform student learning outcomes in the process.

The question we need to address is how do we go from hard pivot to seamless integration? The following are links to articles, blog posts, YouTube videos, TED Talks, and books that were used or referenced in my session for the School Leadership Progress & Innovation Series at Governors State University.

Workshop Slides, Resources & PDFs

Free COVA eBook

Context & Why

No Quick Fix

Technology – No Significant Difference

Learner’s Mindset & Assessment As Learning

Connecting the Dots vs Collecting the Dots

Change in Focus Part A

Links to Authentic Learning & CSLE+COVA posts:
I have been advocating authentic learning or project-based learning and creating significant learning environments for decades both professionally and personally. Talking the talk as an academic takes on a much more significant perspective when you walk the walk in your personal life.

Creating Significant Learning Environments

The CLSE+COVA section of this site is also a great starting place to see how to create a significant learning environment by giving your learners choice, ownership, and voice through authentic learning opportunities.

I want more information and help on how to use the Learner’s Mindset to enable critical thinkers, real-world problem solvers, and lifelong learners!

* indicates required



/

( mm / dd )

After a lifetime of engaging in what is commonly referred to as DIY (do it yourself) projects, I knew I was going to have to review the parts list in my DIY Teleprompter project before I could pass on an updated parts list to a colleague. Why? Unlike going to Ikea that will provide not only detailed instructions and all the necessary components for what you need to assemble, DIY projects involve finding a variety of parts that may be used for a variety of purposes and modifying those parts to serve an entirely new purpose. So when I reviewed the 15mm rod support and baseplate system for my DIY teleprompter I quickly learned that it was no longer available from Amazon. My experience of sourcing these types of projects led me to check and see if all the parts were still available. After searching for and exploring a wide assortment of alternatives I realized that the best that I could do is provide a list of parts that I would more than likely use if I were building my DIY Teleprompter from scratch today.

DIY projects by their very nature require exploring and considering a wide assortment of options in order to create or build a project that can address your unique needs. There is no right answer. There is no quick fix. There is only inquiry, exploration, and trial and error. Unfortunately, most people do not have the learner’s mindset that will enable them to do this sort of problem-solving. We quench this type of exploration and experimentation out of our students with a steady diet of recipe and regurgitation followed by standardized testing.

Fortunately, the DIY movement is strong on the Internet and there are a small number of people willing to explore, experiment and find alternative ways to do it themselves. The rebels or mavericks who are willing to look for a better way, a different way, or simply a cheaper way to solve a problem will keep the DIY movement alive. We are also seeing this type of mindset supported through the maker spaces which are taking the place of shop classes of old. We can also help to keep DIY alive by supporting the learner’s mindset that comes out of creating significant learning environments that give learners choice, ownership, and voice through authentic learning opportunities.

SAMR Model
The four-stage Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model introduced by Rueben Puentedura back in mid-2000 has not only grown in popularity there are people building upon this its unsubstantiated foundation. The SAMR model was initially intended to help K-12 teachers move the up the ladder of technology use by using tech for the creation of new tasks, tech for a significant redesign, tech as a direct substitute with functional improvement, and tech as a direct substitute, with no functional change. SAMR not only looks like an innocuous model of using technology it also seems to appeal to the way many people tend to approach the use of technology. If we look closely at the fundamental presupposition of its use then we will see that there are serious issues in how the model can enhance learning.

The first time I was introduced to the SAMR model was over a decade ago and I recall thinking that this model has a fundamental flaw that many people will tend to overlook. While using technology to simply make an activity or task more efficient or to explore ways to enhance or even redefine that activity or task may seem innocuous or even worthwhile the problem that we run into with this sort of thinking is that we are ignoring the validity of the original task that SAMR is being applied to. For example if you use SAMR to move your paper-based fill in the black worksheet to a digital model (substitution) and then add some branching questions in a google form (augmentation) and then add enabled voice responses (modification) and finally allow your class to create a video to answer the questions (redefinition) the problem is you are still asking your students to regurgitate content regardless how sophisticated the regurgitation becomes. I have also noticed in my time working with hundreds of teachers and faculty that there is a tendency for most people to NOT move beyond the substitution or argumentation level. This means many well-intentioned instructors are not heading Seymour Papert’s warning and are falling into the trap of bolting a jet engine onto a horse cart.

I agree that we should be using technology to become more administratively efficient and to help the guide our learners but we should be using technology to go well beyond the original teaching task and use technology to enhance the learning not just use technology to enhance the use of technology. I am not alone in this thinking. The following articles and sites point to many of the same concerns that I have and develop several others. Another major concern is that the SAMR model has not been well researched as you can see from one of few articles that looks at the model itself.

Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60(5), 433–441.

Like the title indicates the article offers criticism of the SAMR model and recommendations for how it can be used effectively. This article can be downloaded from any academic library.

SAMR: A model without evidence – https://charlielove.org/?p=10025
A very fair assessment of the SAMR model that points to several related sources.

A Critical Review of Puentedura’s SAMR – http://eitcclips.blogspot.com/2015/03/picking-holes-in-samr-critical-review.html
Another fair assessment points to the lack of theoretical or foundational evidence for SAMR.

Through The Looking Glass by Lucy Santos Green – http://www.lucysantosgreen.com/uploads/6/8/3/3/6833178/through_the_looking_glass.pdf
A fair assessment of the SAMR and TPACK models and recommendations on how they can be used more appropriately.

Revised January 24, 2021